
A transcript of the speech can be found here:
President Obama Addresses Muslim World in Cairo
Well, an interesting speech to be sure. There is a lot to agree with here and a lot to disagree with.
Firstly, there is no "Muslim World" and no place called Islam. To try and address 1 billion people, who have some vague similarities due to a common religion. How exactly anyone can address 1 billion people is beyond me, take for example, Indonesia and Saudi Arabia, those 2 countries could not be more different. However, it is best to put this aside and look at the content of the speech.
The first part of his speech is about violent extremism (more or less, there is other stuff mixed in there). While, I agree that the US has every right to defend themselves by going into Afghanistan, because of 9/11, but there tactics there have been pretty counter productive, especially due to the Iraq invasion. If the US can get it act together there, maybe then can actually effect a positive change. Giving aid to Pakistan to build schools and hospitals, and aid to develop Afghanistan is a step in the right direction.
My main issue with what Obama says here is that he seems to see Iraq as a simple mistake, which I find absurd. The US war against Iraq was a War of aggression, which is considered the supreme international crime and he even tries to excuse it by saying that the Iraqi's are better without Saddam, which is especially grating, as he has a huge problem with those who try and make excuses for 9/11. The US murdered 1000's in there war of aggression, and the criminals behind it, are still not behind bars and probably never will be.
Then, the 2nd major part is about Israel/Palestine. Firstly, I reject the Israeli narrative he presents. It is quite simple false. I know that Jews suffered what is perhaps the greatest crime in history, when Nazi Germany exterminated 6 million Jews, but to suggest this made it ok to establish a Jewish state in Palestine, against the wishes of indigenous population of Palestine is repugnant. What, was done to Jews by Europeans, did not give Zionists the right to go to Palestine to set up there own country and ethnically cleanse the indigenous population. Now, of course Israel is a reality and it should be excepted as such, but then so should the reality that its creation was a crime against the Palestinian people and that the Palestinian deserve justice for what was done to them.
Also, he make a good point about Holocaust denial, but the Israeli's have themselves denied the existence of the Palestinian people and more recently
Israel approved a draft law to ban commemoration of the Nakba (the ethnic cleansing in 1948 by Zionists of between 700,000 and 900,000 Palestinians) by the Palestinians who still remain in Israel. It is absurd to condemn one sides denialism and not even mention the other groups denialism.
While, I agree with his comments about Palestinian violence against Israel, he seems to ignore Israel much greater violence against the Palestinians. The recent murderous rampage in Gaza, by the IDF, where they used weapons such as white phosphorous against civilians. While the siege in Gaza was briefly mentioned, it was however not condemned in anyway nearly as strong terms as his condemnation of Palestinian violence.
Now, he is right that both sides need recognize each other rights and that all involved will need to take steps to achieve peace, but the simple fact is that the US has enabled Israeli violence and the fact that Obama did not acknowledge this is disappointing. Will we actually see him take some concrete steps to reign Israel in? I mean something beyond mere words? If he expects the Arab states to use there influence to reign in the Palestinians, the US should be prepared to do the same with Israel.
As for his position on Iran's nuclear program. Personally, I can't take the US seriously here. We are talking about a country with more Nuclear weapons than anyone else and the only country to actually use them during war.
As for the parts, on Democracy, Womens Rights, Economic development and religious freedom, there isn't much to say, as I basically agree with everything said in those parts of the speech. So there isn't anything to discuss really. I do think he could have been more forceful about democracy, but considering the location of the speech, I could see why it wasn't done.
Ultimately the speech is interesting and welcome change from Bush, but words alone don't mean a whole lot and hopefully they will be back up by actions.